Custom Vue.js Web Applications
Dashboards, portals and SaaS front ends in Vue 3, with state, routing and API layers structured to grow.
TECHNOLOGY
Vue 3 applications, Nuxt front ends and component libraries for USA teams including the Vue 2 migrations that stopped being optional when Vue 2 passed end of life.
The four engagements that most often start a Vue.js project.
Dashboards, portals and SaaS front ends in Vue 3, with state, routing and API layers structured to grow.
Moving apps off an end-of-life version in planned steps, using the official migration build so features keep shipping.
Server-rendered and static Vue sites with Nuxt, for pages that need to load fast and be found in search.
A clear read on an existing Vue app: what’s outdated, what’s risky and what to fix first.
Vue.js is an open-source JavaScript framework for building user interfaces, from a single interactive widget on an existing page to a complete single-page application.
That range is Vue’s defining trait. It can be added to one part of a server-rendered site without rebuilding the rest, or used as the foundation of a full product. Its single-file components keep a component’s template, logic and styles together, which many teams find easier to read and review than the alternatives.
Vue development is the work of building on that foundation in a way that still holds up when the app is ten times larger: clear component boundaries, predictable state, typed APIs and a build setup that doesn’t need a specialist to maintain. For the wider discipline, see front-end development.
Vue 2 reached end of life on December 31, 2023. The official Vue 2 end-of-life notice is explicit: the version no longer receives new features, updates or fixes, including security fixes.
An app on Vue 2 doesn’t stop working on January 1. The risk builds quietly:
Security issues stay open. Vulnerabilities found in Vue 2 itself, or in libraries that have also stopped supporting it, aren’t patched.
The ecosystem moves on. UI libraries, plugins and tooling release new versions for Vue 3 only, so every dependency upgrade gets harder.
Compliance questions get awkward. A security review or questionnaire that asks whether you run supported software now has an uncomfortable answer.
Hiring gets harder. Developers increasingly learn Vue 3 first, and Vue 2 patterns look unfamiliar to them.
None of this is an emergency on its own. Together, it’s a reason to put the migration on the roadmap now rather than when a security review forces it.
The fear with Vue 2 migrations is a months-long rewrite with nothing shipped. That’s rarely necessary.
Vue provides an official migration build, @vue/compat: Vue 3 running in a mode that supports most Vue 2 behavior and warns about each deprecated pattern it meets. The app runs on Vue 3 early, and the warnings become the to-do list.
How we sequence it:
Two things not to do: rewrite every component in the Composition API during the migration (Vue 3 fully supports the Options API, so that’s a separate decision), and change the build tool, state library and framework version in a single step. One change at a time keeps every step reversible.
A Vue 3 project started today looks different from one started a few years ago. The defaults have changed, and older tutorials still describe the old ones.
Vite is the build tool behind create-vue, the official project scaffold. Vue CLI, the previous default, is in maintenance mode.
Pinia is the official state management library, replacing Vuex as the recommendation for new projects. It’s simpler, works naturally with TypeScript and needs far less boilerplate.
Vue Router handles routing, as it always has, now in a version built for Vue 3.
TypeScript is a first-class option rather than an add-on, and on any app expected to live for years we treat it as the default.
The Composition API sits alongside the Options API. Neither is deprecated. We use the Composition API for logic shared across components and don’t force a style change on code that already works.
A standard Vue app renders in the browser. For a product behind a login, that’s fine. For public pages that need to appear in search results and load fast on a first visit, it’s a handicap.
Nuxt is the framework built on Vue for that job. It adds server-side rendering, static generation, file-based routing and a server layer, in the same way Next.js does for React.
Use Nuxt when the pages are public and search traffic matters: marketing sites, content, storefronts, public product pages.
Skip Nuxt when the app lives behind authentication and nothing needs to be indexed. A plain Vue app with Vite is simpler to build, host and maintain.
Many products use both: Nuxt for the public site and a plain Vue app for the logged-in product, sharing components between them.
The useful part of any technology page, and the part most leave out.
Your team already works in React or Angular. Vue is a good framework, but not a good enough reason to split a front-end team across two. The best framework is usually the one your engineers already maintain.
You need a native mobile app. Vue’s mobile options are thinner than React’s. If a shared web and mobile codebase matters, React Native has the larger ecosystem.
Your required libraries are React-only. Some design systems, editors and enterprise component suites ship for React first, or only. Check before committing.
The Vue 2 app works and is about to be retired. Migrating an application you’ll replace within the year is effort with no return. Plan for the replacement instead.
What a Vue.js engagement looks like day to day.
The Vue developers on your kickoff call write the code. No handover to a delivery pool after signature.
A fixed daily overlap window agreed before the engagement starts. Standups, reviews and release decisions sit inside it; everything else runs asynchronously with written updates.
A migration that freezes your roadmap for a quarter is a migration your business will cancel halfway. We run upgrades in small batches next to normal feature work, so the product keeps moving while it modernizes.
VUE.JS
Four things worth knowing before you shortlist a Vue.js development company.
Composition API, TypeScript, Pinia and Vite. Not a 2019 setup with a new version number.
The official migration build and small batches, so Vue 2 apps move forward while features keep shipping.
If React or a native app suits your team better, you’ll hear it before the contract.
Code, repositories and build pipelines in your name from day one.
It works, but it’s no longer maintained. Vue 2 reached end of life on December 31, 2023, and no longer receives fixes, including security fixes. The risk grows over time: unpatched issues, libraries dropping support, and awkward answers on security reviews. It isn’t an emergency, but the migration belongs on your roadmap now rather than after a review forces it.
It depends on your dependencies more than your own code. Libraries with no Vue 3 version set the timeline, which is why we inventory them before estimating. With the official migration build, the app can run on Vue 3 early and the remaining work happens in batches alongside feature development, so the question is less about how long the freeze lasts and more about how many sprints carry migration work.
Both are mature and capable, so the deciding factors are practical. Choose the one your team already knows. If starting fresh, React has the larger ecosystem and a stronger mobile story through React Native; Vue is often quicker for teams to pick up, and its single-file components keep templates, logic and styles together. Neither choice will limit a typical web product.
Use Nuxt when public pages need to be found in search and load quickly on a first visit: marketing sites, content and storefronts. A plain Vue app built with Vite is simpler when everything sits behind a login. Many products use both, with Nuxt for the public site and a plain Vue app for the logged-in product.
For new code, yes. Pinia is now the official recommendation, with simpler syntax and better TypeScript support. For an existing app, there’s no rush to rewrite working Vuex stores. The two can run side by side, so new features can use Pinia while older stores move over gradually, or not at all if they’re stable.
No. Vue 3 fully supports the Options API, and it isn’t deprecated. The Composition API is most useful for logic shared across many components and for TypeScript-heavy code. Rewriting working components purely to change style costs time and adds risk without changing what users see.
Yes, with the right structure. Large Vue apps stay maintainable with TypeScript, Pinia for shared state, clear module boundaries and composables for reusable logic. The risk at scale isn’t the framework; it’s an app that grew without conventions. If your team already standardizes on React or Angular elsewhere, consistency across the organization may matter more than Vue’s advantages.
Tell us what you’re building and we’ll tell you how we’d approach it scope, timeline and estimate, at no cost.