INDUSTRIES
Clinical platforms where privacy rules shape the architecture before the first screen — built by a team that has already shipped a HIPAA-ready system for a multi-clinic network.
We built a HIPAA-ready platform that pulled telemedicine, scheduling, and billing into one system for a multi-clinic provider network. Clinical software teaches you things a feature list never shows — what happens when two clinicians open the same chart, when an integration drops a message, when a patient asks who viewed their record.
Four kinds of healthcare build, from a single clinical workflow to a platform under audit.
Telemedicine platforms with scheduling, video consultation, and clinical documentation in one flow. Built as mobile apps or browser-based, depending on whether your patients are at home or your clinicians are between rooms.
Patient portals where people book appointments, pay bills, and access records without calling the front desk. The measure that matters is call volume, not sign-ups.
Practice management systems covering scheduling, billing, and revenue cycle workflows — including the eligibility checks and claim rejections that consume most of a billing team's week.
EHR and HL7 integrations that connect the systems clinicians already work in. Most clinical projects are integration projects wearing a different name.
Healthcare software development is the building of applications that handle protected health information patient records, clinical workflows, scheduling, and billing. The constraint that separates it from general software is that access itself is regulated. In most systems, reading a record is free. In a clinical system, every read is an event somebody may later have to account for.
HIPAA shapes the architecture before the first screen is designed. Encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access at the record level, audit logging on every read and write, and automatic session termination aren't features you add later. They determine the data model, and retrofitting them usually means rebuilding it.
We design for the smallest PHI footprint that supports the workflow, then document which systems hold it. That document is what your compliance officer asks for first.
Infrastructure runs in your own cloud accounts under a signed BAA, with every subprocessor covered. We build to what HIPAA requires. We're not an auditor and don't issue certifications.
The systems clinicians already use decide your timeline more than your feature list does. Epic, Cerner, and athenahealth each have their own integration paths. HL7 v2 and FHIR are different worlds. A lab interface that looks like one line on a scope document can take a month.
Common integrations: EHR systems, lab and imaging interfaces, e-prescribing networks, clearinghouses and payers, pharmacy systems, and the practice management platform your billing team already reconciles against.
This is why discovery is fixed-price and happens before any estimate. The integration audit is where the real number comes from.
React and Next.js at the interface, Node.js or Python behind PostgreSQL, deployed on AWS or Azure under a signed BAA. Boring, well-understood technology, because a clinical system is not where you experiment.
Discovery is fixed-price and produces a costed estimate. Three things move the number more than feature count:
Compliance scope. How much PHI the system holds, and how many places it lives.
Integration count. Each EHR, lab, or payer connection adds real time. A documented FHIR API might add two weeks; a legacy HL7 interface with no documentation can add a month.
Clinical workflow complexity. A single-specialty scheduling tool and a multi-site platform covering records, orders, and billing are different builds entirely.
We don't quote from a price list. You get a costed timeline in writing after discovery.
Clinical systems still in daily use.
A HIPAA-ready platform that pulled telemedicine, scheduling, and billing into one system for a multi-clinic network.
A high-availability payment gateway that has processed over $500M in transactions at 99.99% reliability.
How we work
The same delivery process behind 800+ projects, applied to systems where a mistake reaches a patient.
01
We map the clinical workflows, the data flows, and which PHI touches which system.
02
Access model, audit logging, and integration approach settled before code.
03
Flows prototyped with the clinicians who will use them, not with administrators.
04
Two-week sprints with audit logging running from the first record written.
What clients in real estate ask us most often.
Still have questions?
Talk to an engineerWe build to what HIPAA requires encryption, role-based access, audit trails, session controls, and BAAs with every subprocessor. We're not an auditor and don't issue certifications, and we'll tell you when you need one.
Yes. HL7 v2 and FHIR are both standard work, along with the vendor-specific paths for major EHRs. We scope the integration after seeing the actual interface documentation, because published capability and available capability often differ.
Every read and write is logged with user, record, timestamp, and action. That log is queryable, retained per your policy, and separated from application logs so a compliance request doesn't require an engineer to go digging.
Yes. Video consultation, scheduling, clinical documentation, and e-prescribing integrations are standard components. State licensure rules affect what you can offer where, and we design for the states you actually operate in.
Discovery is fixed-price and produces a costed estimate. Compliance scope and integration count move the number more than feature count does. A single-workflow tool and a multi-site clinical platform are different builds entirely.
You do. Source code, infrastructure definitions, and design files live in your repositories and cloud accounts from the first sprint, which also matters for the vendor risk assessments your partners will run.
Tell us what the clinical workflow looks like and we'll map it into an architecture, compliance scope, and estimate at no cost.