Retrieval systems (RAG)
Retrieval systems that answer from your documents instead of inventing answers.
SERVICES
Most AI projects fail somewhere between the demo and production. We build the part that survives contact with real users and real data.
Plenty of problems that get proposed as AI work are better solved with a rules engine, a search index, or a fixed form. We say so before the contract, because an AI feature nobody trusts costs more than the one you never built.

Four kinds of AI work, sequenced by how much your data is ready for.
Retrieval systems that answer from your documents instead of inventing answers.
Agents that take actions in your systems, with limits on what they can touch.
Classification, forecasting, and recommendation where classical models still win.
AI features added to software you already run, without rebuilding it.
AI development means building software where part of the behavior is learned or generated rather than written out in advance. That shift moves most of the engineering effort somewhere unfamiliar — into data preparation, evaluation, and the guardrails that decide what the system is allowed to do when it's unsure.
The demo is the easy part. A model answering ten questions well proves almost nothing about the thousandth. What separates a shipped feature from a stalled pilot is an evaluation suite built early, a defined behavior for low-confidence answers, and a person accountable for reviewing what the system produced.
Prompting first, because it's cheapest to change. Retrieval when the answers live in your own documents. Fine-tuning when you need a consistent format or tone at volume. Classical machine learning when the task is prediction rather than language — and that's more often than the current conversation suggests.
Your data has to be findable, reasonably clean, and permissioned before any of this works. Most AI engagements that stall do so here, which is why we audit it in discovery — usually alongside the back-end systems holding it. Sometimes the honest recommendation is to fix the data first and revisit the AI in six months.
Where your data goes, what leaves your systems, and what a model provider retains. We design for the answer your compliance team needs, and we tell you plainly which parts of a given approach aren't compatible with regulated data — which matters most for healthcare and fintech clients.
Discovery is fixed-price and produces a costed estimate. Data readiness drives the number more than model choice does. Running costs matter too — token spend, retrieval infrastructure, and the human review time an honest design includes.
Our AI Development Process
01
We define the task, the data behind it, and what a correct answer looks like.
02
Approach chosen and an evaluation set built before any feature work starts.
03
The interface designed around uncertainty, because the model will sometimes be wrong.
04
Two-week sprints, each measured against the evaluation set, not against impressions.
A HIPAA-ready platform that pulled telemedicine, scheduling, and billing into one system for a multi-clinic network.

A high-availability payment gateway that has processed over $500M in transactions at 99.99% reliability.

A banking app serving more than a million users, with biometric authentication and 99.9% uptime.

A headless commerce replatform that increased online sales by 150% and survived Black Friday without a wobble.

A real-time analytics platform that improved decision-making speed by 60% across production and supply chain.

A zero-downtime migration from on-premise data centers to AWS that cut infrastructure costs by 40%.

Still have questions?
Talk to an engineerRetrieval when the answers already exist in your documents and need finding. Fine-tuning when you need consistent format, tone, or structure at volume. They solve different problems, and retrieval is usually the cheaper place to start.
You design for them rather than pretending them away. Retrieval grounds answers in real sources, confidence thresholds route uncertain cases to a person, and the interface shows where an answer came from so users can check it.
It depends on the approach and the provider. We map what leaves your environment, what's retained, and for how long, then design around whatever your compliance position requires — including keeping data in your own infrastructure.
Everything. Prompts, evaluation sets, data pipelines, and application code live in your repositories from the first sprint. Model weights belong to whoever trained them, and we make that boundary explicit upfront.
Because model behavior changes. Providers update models, your data shifts, and users find inputs nobody anticipated. An evaluation suite is how you notice before your customers do.